Difference between revisions of "Talk:The SHA-3 Zoo"

From The ECRYPT Hash Function Website
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Would such a modification be welcome to the SHA-3 Zoo contributors?
 
Would such a modification be welcome to the SHA-3 Zoo contributors?
 +
 +
Paulo.

Revision as of 14:22, 18 November 2008

I'm thinking about introducing another column to the list of submissions to provide a rough, overall classification of the candidates (e.g. classical Merkle-Damgaard vs. HAIFA vs. sponge vs. tree-based vs. streaming vs. ...), motivated by private messages I've got comparing the current SHA-3 Zoo with my old hash lounge.

However, finding the most appropriate category for some submissions may be a tough task; paradigms may be so distorted as to be nearly unrecognizable. Still, other candidates exhibit a much more transparent structure, and I think this information may be useful (e.g. comparing submissions that fall on distinct categories may not be as fair as comparing functions that share a high-level structure).

Would such a modification be welcome to the SHA-3 Zoo contributors?

Paulo.