Difference between revisions of "The SHA-3 Zoo"
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The idea of the SHA-3 Zoo is to give a good overview of cryptanalytic results. We try to avoid additional judgement whether a submission is broken. The answer to this question is left to NIST. However, we categorize the cryptanalytic results by their impact from very theoretic to practical attacks. A detailed description is given in [[Cryptanalysis Categories]]. | The idea of the SHA-3 Zoo is to give a good overview of cryptanalytic results. We try to avoid additional judgement whether a submission is broken. The answer to this question is left to NIST. However, we categorize the cryptanalytic results by their impact from very theoretic to practical attacks. A detailed description is given in [[Cryptanalysis Categories]]. | ||
| − | At this time, 55 out of 64 submissions to the SHA-3 competition are publicly known and available. [http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/Round1/submissions_rnd1.html | + | At this time, 55 out of 64 submissions to the SHA-3 competition are publicly known and available. 51 [http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/hash/sha-3/Round1/submissions_rnd1.html submissions] have advanced to the first round. |
So far, 3 out of 51 first round candidates have been officially conceded broken or withdrawn by the designers. | So far, 3 out of 51 first round candidates have been officially conceded broken or withdrawn by the designers. | ||
| − | The following table should give a first impression on the remaining SHA-3 candidates. It shows only the best known attack, more detailed results are collected at the individual hash function pages. A description of the main table is given [ | + | The following table should give a first impression on the remaining SHA-3 candidates. It shows only the best known attack, more detailed results are collected at the individual hash function pages. A description of the main table is given [[Cryptanalysis_Categories#Main_Cryptanalysis_Table | here]]. |
[http://ehash.iaik.tugraz.at/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangeslinked&target=The_SHA-3_Zoo&days=7&limit=50&hideminor=1 Recent updates of the SHA-3 Zoo] | [http://ehash.iaik.tugraz.at/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangeslinked&target=The_SHA-3_Zoo&days=7&limit=50&hideminor=1 Recent updates of the SHA-3 Zoo] | ||
Revision as of 13:08, 30 December 2008
The SHA-3 Zoo (work in progress) is a collection of cryptographic hash functions (in alphabetical order) submitted to the SHA-3 contest (see also here). It aims to provide an overview of design and cryptanalysis of all submissions. A list of all SHA-3 submitters is also available. For a software performance related overview, see eBASH. At a separate page, we also collect hardware implementation results of the candidates. Another categorization of the SHA-3 submissions can be found here.
The idea of the SHA-3 Zoo is to give a good overview of cryptanalytic results. We try to avoid additional judgement whether a submission is broken. The answer to this question is left to NIST. However, we categorize the cryptanalytic results by their impact from very theoretic to practical attacks. A detailed description is given in Cryptanalysis Categories.
At this time, 55 out of 64 submissions to the SHA-3 competition are publicly known and available. 51 submissions have advanced to the first round. So far, 3 out of 51 first round candidates have been officially conceded broken or withdrawn by the designers.
The following table should give a first impression on the remaining SHA-3 candidates. It shows only the best known attack, more detailed results are collected at the individual hash function pages. A description of the main table is given here.
Recent updates of the SHA-3 Zoo
| Hash Name | Principal Submitter | Best Attack on Main NIST Requirements | Best Attack on other Hash Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abacus | Neil Sholer | 2nd-preimage | |
| ARIRANG | Jongin Lim | ||
| AURORA | Masahiro Fujita (Sony) | ||
| BLAKE | Jean-Philippe Aumasson | ||
| Blender | Dr. Colin Bradbury | preimage | |
| Blue Midnight Wish | Svein Johan Knapskog | ||
| Cheetah | Dmitry Khovratovich | length-extension | |
| CHI | Phillip Hawkes | ||
| CRUNCH | Jacques Patarin | ||
| CubeHash | D. J. Bernstein | preimage | |
| DCH | David A. Wilson | collision | |
| Dynamic SHA | Xu Zijie | length-extension | |
| Dynamic SHA2 | Xu Zijie | length-extension | |
| ECHO | Henri Gilbert | ||
| ECOH | Daniel R. L. Brown | ||
| Edon-R | Danilo Gligoroski | preimage | |
| EnRUPT | Sean O’Neil | collision | |
| ESSENCE | Jason Worth Martin | ||
| FSB | Matthieu Finiasz | ||
| Fugue | Charanjit S. Jutla | ||
| Grøstl | Lars Ramkilde Knudsen | ||
| Hamsi | Ozgul Kucuk | ||
| JH | Hongjun Wu | preimage | |
| Keccak | Joan Daemen | ||
| Khichidi-1 | M Vidyasagar | collision | |
| LANE | Sebastiann Indesteege | ||
| Lesamnta | Hirotaka Yoshida | ||
| Luffa | Dai Watanabe | ||
| LUX | Ivica Nikolic | ||
| MCSSHA-3 | Mikhail Maslennikov | collision | |
| MD6 | Ronald L. Rivest | ||
| MeshHash | Björn Fay | 2nd preimage | |
| NaSHA | Smile Markovski | collision | |
| SANDstorm | Rich Schroeppel | ||
| Sarmal | Kerem VARICI | preimage | |
| Sgàil | Peter Maxwell | collision | |
| Shabal | Jean-Francois Misarsky | ||
| SHAMATA | Orhun Kara | ||
| SHAvite-3 | Orr Dunkelman | ||
| SIMD | Gaetan Leurent | ||
| Skein | Bruce Schneier | ||
| Spectral Hash | Cetin Kaya Koc | ||
| StreamHash | Michal Trojnara | collision | |
| SWIFFTX | Daniele Micciancio | ||
| Tangle | Rafael Alvarez | collision | |
| TIB3 | Daniel Penazzi | ||
| Twister | Michael Gorski | 2nd preimage | |
| Vortex | Michael Kounavis | preimage |
The following hash functions have been submitted to the NIST competition but did not advance to the first round or have been conceded broken by the designers:
| Hash Name | Principal Submitter | Status | Best Attack on Main NIST Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boole | Greg Rose | conceded broken | collision |
| HASH 2X | not in round 1 | 2nd-preimage | |
| Maraca | not in round 1 | ||
| NKS2D | not in round 1 | collision | |
| Ponic | not in round 1 | 2nd-preimage | |
| WaMM | John Washburn | conceded broken | collision |
| Waterfall | Bob Hattersley | conceded broken | collision |
Your analysis is not mentioned? Drop a line at sha3zoo@iaik.tugraz.at to let us know!
