Difference between revisions of "The Hash Function Zoo"
From The ECRYPT Hash Function Website
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| [[Edon-R]] || Gligoroski, Markovski, Kocarev || align="center"|2006 || ? | | [[Edon-R]] || Gligoroski, Markovski, Kocarev || align="center"|2006 || ? | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[FFT- | + | | [[FFT-Hash I]] || Schnorr || align="center"|1991 || broken |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | [[FFT-Hash | + | | [[FFT-Hash II]] || Schnorr || align="center"|1992 || broken |
|- | |- | ||
| [[FORK-256]] || Hong, Chang, Sung, Lee, Hong, Lee, Moon, Chee || align="center"|2006 || broken | | [[FORK-256]] || Hong, Chang, Sung, Lee, Hong, Lee, Moon, Chee || align="center"|2006 || broken | ||
Revision as of 11:32, 3 November 2008
| Hash Function Name | Designer(s) | Issued in | Status Cryptanalysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| AR | ISO | 1992 | broken |
| Boognish | Daemen | 1992 | broken |
| Cellhash | Daemen, Govaerts, Vandewalle | 1991 | ? |
| DHA-256 | Lee, Chang, Kim, Lee, Hong | 2006 | ? |
| Edon-R | Gligoroski, Markovski, Kocarev | 2006 | ? |
| FFT-Hash I | Schnorr | 1991 | broken |
| FFT-Hash II | Schnorr | 1992 | broken |
| FORK-256 | Hong, Chang, Sung, Lee, Hong, Lee, Moon, Chee | 2006 | broken |
| FSB | Augot, Finiasz, Sendrier | 2005 | ? |
| GOST | Government Committee of Russia for Standards | 1990 | broken |
| Grindahl-256 | Knudsen, Rechberger, Thomsen | 2007 | broken |
| Grindahl-512 | Knudsen, Rechberger, Thomsen | 2007 | ? |
| HAS-160 | Telecommunications Technology Association of Korea | 2000 | ? |
| HAS-V | Park, Hwang, Lee | 2000 | broken |
| HAVAL | Zheng, Pieprzyk, Seberry | 1994 | broken |
| LAKE | Aumasson, Meier, Phan | 2008 | ? |
| LASH-n | Bentahar, Page, Saarinen, Silverman, Smart | 2006 | broken |
| MAME | Yoshida, Watanabe, Okeya, Kitahara, Wu, Kucuk, Preneel | 2007 | ? |
| MD2 | Rivest | 1989 | broken |
| MD4 | Rivest | 1990 | broken |
| MD5 | Rivest | 1992 | broken |
| N-Hash | Miyaguchi, Ohta, Iwata | 1990 | broken |
| PANAMA | Daemen, Clapp | 1998 | broken |
| ParallelFFT-Hash | Schnorr, Vaudenay | 1993 | ? |
| PARSHA-256 | Pal, Sarkar | 2003 | ? |
| PKC-HASH | Shin, Rhee, Ryu, Lee | 1998 | broken |
| RadioGatun | Bertoni, Daemen, Peeters, van Assche | 2006 | ? |
| RC4-HASH | Chang, Gupta, Nandi | 2006 | broken |
| RIPEMD | The RIPE Consortium | 1990 | broken |
| RIPEMD-128 | Dobbertin, Bosselaers, Preneel | 1996 | ? |
| RIPEMD-160 | Dobbertin, Bosselaers, Preneel | 1996 | ? |
| SHA-0 | NIST/NSA | 1991 | broken |
| SHA-1 | NIST/NSA | 1993 | broken |
| SHA-256 | NIST/NSA | 2000 | ? |
| SHA-512 | NIST/NSA | 2000 | ? |
| SMASH | Knudsen | 2005 | broken |
| Snefru-n | Merkle | 1990 | broken |
| StepRightUp | Daemen | 1995 | broken |
| SubHash | Daemen | 1992 | ? |
| Tiger | Anderson, Biham | 1996 | broken |
| VSH | Contini, Lenstra, Steinfeld, | 2005 | ? |
| Whirlpool | Barreto and Rijmen | 2000 | ? |
Regarding the column cryptanalysis status, for simplicity reasons we take the following view. As soon as there are results suggesting that an expected property of a hash function is less than ideal, we list it as 'broken'. Resulting attacks may be by no means practical.
Note that the source for most of the data collected here (proposals and analysis results) is published in one of the following venues. Journal of Cryptology, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, proceedings of IACR conferences like Crypto, Eurocrypt, Asiacrypt, FSE. Additionally also SAC, ISC, CT-RSA, PKCS, FIPS and ISO Standards are used.
