Difference between revisions of "SHAMATA"

Revision as of 15:48, 1 December 2008

Adem Atalay, Orhun Kara, Ferhat Karakoc, Cevat Manap - SHAMATA HASH FUNCTION ALGORITHM SPECIFICATIONS

,2008

Author : Adem Atalay, Orhun Kara, Ferhat Karakoc, Cevat Manap
Title : SHAMATA HASH FUNCTION ALGORITHM SPECIFICATIONS
In : -
Address :
Date : 2008

Ewan Fleischmann, Michael Gorski - Some Observations on SHAMATA

,2008

Author : Ewan Fleischmann, Michael Gorski
Title : Some Observations on SHAMATA
In : -
Address :
Date : 2008

Adem Atalay, Orhun Kara, Ferhat Karakoc - Improved Cryptanalysis of SHAMATA-BC

,2008

Author : Adem Atalay, Orhun Kara, Ferhat Karakoc
Title : Improved Cryptanalysis of SHAMATA-BC
In : -
Address :
Date : 2008

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
    howpublished = {Available online},
    year      = {2008},
+  abstract = {In this note we discuss some observation of the SHA-3 candidate SHAMATA [1]. We ob-
+serve that its internal block cipher is very weak, which could possibly lead to an attack on the hash
+function.},
+}
+</bibtex>
+<bibtex>
+@misc{shamataAKK08,
+  author    = {Adem Atalay and Orhun Kara and Ferhat Karakoc},
+  title     = {Improved Cryptanalysis of SHAMATA-BC},
+  url        = {http://www.uekae.tubitak.gov.tr/uekae_content_files/crypto/improved_analysis_of_Shamata-BC.pdf},
+  howpublished = {Available online},
+  year      = {2008},
+  abstract = {We state the design ﬂaws of the 1-round block cipher SHA-
+MATA-BC, designed by Fleishmann and Gorski by using the building
+blocks of SHAMATA hash function. We ﬁx the ﬂaws and then show that
+the amended version of SHAMATA-BC is much weaker. We believe that
+there is no connection between security level of SHAMATA as a hash
+function and that of SHAMATA-BC as a block cipher},
 }
 </bibtex>