Difference between revisions of "RIPEMD-160"

Revision as of 07:22, 11 March 2008

Hans Dobbertin, Antoon Bosselaers, Bart Preneel - RIPEMD-160: A Strengthened Version of RIPEMD

FSE 1039:71-82,1996

Author : Hans Dobbertin, Antoon Bosselaers, Bart Preneel
Title : RIPEMD-160: A Strengthened Version of RIPEMD
In : FSE -
Address :
Date : 1996

Florian Mendel, Norbert Pramstaller, Christian Rechberger, Vincent Rijmen - On the Collision Resistance of RIPEMD-160

ISC 4176:101-116,2006

Author : Florian Mendel, Norbert Pramstaller, Christian Rechberger, Vincent Rijmen
Title : On the Collision Resistance of RIPEMD-160
In : ISC -
Address :
Date : 2006

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 === Collision Attacks ===
-----
+<bibtex>
+@inproceedings{iswMendelPRR06,
+  author    = {Florian Mendel and Norbert Pramstaller and Christian Rechberger and Vincent Rijmen},
+  title     = {On the Collision Resistance of RIPEMD-160},
+  booktitle = {ISC},
+  year      = {2006},
+  pages     = {101-116},
+  url        = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11836810_8},
+  editor    = {Sokratis K. Katsikas and Javier Lopez and Michael Backes and Stefanos Gritzalis and Bart Preneel},
+  publisher = {Springer},
+  series    = {LNCS},
+  volume    = {4176},
+  isbn      = {3-540-38341-7},
+  abstract  = {In this article, the RIPEMD-160 hash function is studied in detail. To analyze the hash function, we have extended existing approaches and used recent results in cryptanalysis. While RIPEMD and RIPEMD-128 reduced to 3 rounds are vulnerable to the attack, it is not feasible for RIPEMD-160. Furthermore, we present an analytical attack on a round-reduced variant of the RIPEMD-160 hash function. To the best of our knowledge this is the first article that investigates the impact of recent advances in cryptanalysis of hash functions on RIPEMD-160.},
+}
+</bibtex>
 === Second Preimage Attacks ===